Since 4.5 still has a little left before they finish the
regular season, here are the final results from 4.0 flight play. Bold flight winners head straight to
cities. Italicized second place teams
and third place teams head to QT, with McKinney and SpringPark just missing the
playoffs. I’m not a fan of the two
flight format for city playoffs. It will
produce the best team but will not always produce the second best team. Since Dallas often gets a wild card, this
seems a little unfair. Of course the
Dallas wild card doesn’t typically do a lot at sectionals so maybe it doesn’t
matter.
City playoffs - High Point/Le will be the #1 seed at
cities and should have Brookhaven/Bartlett and one of the QT winners in its
flight. Bartlett gets the High Point flight
based on the sets lost tie breaker. Since I
think High Point wins it all, they’ll need to be picked to win their flight
first.
The other flight should be Oasis/Moehler, GTC/Sisk and the
other QT winner. Here’s a real
mystery. I don’t think I know anyone on
the Oasis roster but there’s no denying they are undefeated. Everyone knows GTC/Sisk but it’s been a while
since he’s been a factor. This will come
down to who is available as neither team seems to sport a lot of depth.
QT playoffs – Again, a two flight format with both
flight winners headed to city playoffs.
Greenhill/Ohl should be the #1 seed but I’m not sure that’s a good
thing. They should have Oak Creek/Head
and Fretz/Noel in their flight. Ohl was
the preseason favorite to come out of QT but he lost his best singles player to
a Fort Worth team. If Corey can get his singles stud out for the playoffs, I’ll take him in the upset. Otherwise it should remain Ohl.
The other flight should be Oak Creek/Ramasami, Oak Creek/Lai
and Greenhill/Wendelken, guaranteeing that a new player will be at 4.0 cities
this year. I don’t see Greenhill being a
factor here so I’ll take Oak Creek. Your
guess on which one is as good as mine.
Flight A – Oasis/Moehler
9-0 (35-10)
Oak Creek/Lai 8-1
(29-16)
Fretz/Noel 7-2 (31-14)
Flight B – High
Point/Le 9-0 (40-5)
Greenhill/Ohl 8-1
(34-11)
SpringPark/Walters 5-4 (26-19)
Flight C – Brookhaven/Bartlett
8-1 (32-13) (31)
Oak Creek/Ramasami 8-1
(28-17)
McKinney/Bazan 6-3 (27-18)
Flight D – GTC/Sisk
8-1 (32-13) (30)
Oak Creek/Head 7-2
(32-13)
Greenhill/Wendelken
6-3 (31-14)
And even though I don't know what over 50% of the complaints are actually about, it is pretty entertaining on occasion.
ReplyDeleteWhats funny is the Rigney team all won 6-1 or 6-0 in their finals win but Mike Z only one on here bragging about it. To take it a step further his teammates played opponents with better regular season records. So it looks like Mike Z had the lesser quality opponent (his finals opponent 1-12 in 2014) but yet his teammates still won 6-1, 0r 6-0 in three of the final wins against better competition. I am sure you will see Zacry back on to dispute the above.
Deleteyes Fw sucks it will be very hard to beat Le team.
DeleteLe has a solid team should be fun when we play them.
Le is the favorite and we just hope we can compete with him
mike zackary
Zackry Dominate FW!!!!!
ReplyDeleteOnly loses 1 game on Sunday WOW
Maybe he only play 1 game.
Deleteboth 1:37 and 1:54 are Zachary posting. Obvious he wants people to respond.
DeleteI will respond. "Wow, way to go. You beat two guys that were a combined 4-13, one a 3.5 bump up. A weak FW opponent and weaker 4.0 team. Good job!"
Deletethank you.
DeleteZackry will beat anyone on Le team
DeleteSpelling your name wrong doesn't throw anybody off track. If that was the case Tony would have put you on the team. Not sure you would be in the top 5.
DeleteLiked your analysis on 4.0. We played Oasis and I still don't know much about them. They did seem to get lucky and have every important match scheduled out in east Texas. That won't happen in playoffs so will probably be a different outcome for them.
ReplyDeleteDon't you need to win your QT fight first?
DeleteI didn't say we would beat them. I have two teams that have a good shot to get out of QT but not much else.
DeleteI brought up the playoff format back in 2009.
ReplyDeleteWhen there are two flights, a playback match (if needed), needs to be in the format.
A playback match occurs when the winner of the 3rd place match and the loser in the championship match have not played.
For example:
Red 1 beats Blue 1 in Championship
Red 2 beats Blue 2 for 3rd
Then there is a playback match.
Then Red 2 and Blue 1 play for 2nd.
Red 1 beats Blue 1 in Championship
Blue 2 beats Red 2 for 3rd
Then there is a no playback match.
Schedule would be:
1 match Friday
2 matches on Saturday
2 possible matches on Sunday
Championship and 3rd place match at the same time
Playback match if needed
Ive sed it beefour and aisle say it agin...(for what its wroth) I've captioned teems and Ide never have Zakry on one of my roosters again.
ReplyDeleteTo 5:16
DeleteThis post needs to go in the hall of fame! (still lmao)
Absolutely classic! Great work!
wimp not saying who you are..
Deletewussy
so who is this?
ReplyDeletename chicken?
What happened to Bazan's team? It looked like they were a lock for cities after the first five matches.
ReplyDeleteIs that picture suppose to be a blank box?
ReplyDeleteLe the best team in Dallas then who second best?
ReplyDeleteOhl was before Zackary left
DeleteIf Sisk's guy come to play, they can beat Tony. I think they have been laying back just waiting to catch everyone by surprise.
DeleteThe most annoying thing about this is whether you recruit out of level players or tank to get down......never file a grievance! !! There is a name for those who do!!
ReplyDeleteSnitches get stitches man....
DeleteWhere is all the holier than thou wrath? If you lie on a self rate form or bring in an ex-super without waiting 5 years, you're gonna get busted. The rest all subjective. If you didn't watch the match you should have no opinion about whether someone lost intentionally. And you sure shouldn't call Todd Reed.
DeleteSisk why you file grievance against Le team?
ReplyDelete