I hope this isn’t too self indulgent but here we go. I played 8.0 mixed a few years ago. While not a dominant 4.5, I suppose I’m
somewhere in the middle – don’t get bumped up, don’t get bumped down. For my first match I was paired with a short
3.5 woman against two pretty good 4.0s.
We were beaten soundly. The first
set I couldn’t serve and volley like I’m used to doing because every time I approached
the net my partner got lobbed. I stayed
back to get in groundstroke rallies, surely I can win those exchanges. And I did, until someone ripped one at my
partner. And that was when I actually
go to hit a ball, which wasn’t often. In
the second set I decided I needed to make more of my meager opportunities. My partner was playing to her ability, I needed
to do more. Hit a few winners, forced a
few errors, but as the need to win the point every time I touched the ball
increased, well, I ended up making more errors trying to hit shots I wasn’t as
comfortable with.
I didn’t go winless. There
are some bad teams out there. But it was
clear that my style of doubles didn’t work well in mixed. It was also clear that I wasn’t used to carrying
a partner that was a lot lower than me.
And the keep-away aspect of mixed drove me nuts. I hesitate to say I wasn’t good enough, but I
clearly wasn’t good enough at whatever mixed was. And that was my final take away – whatever mixed
was. It wasn’t men’s tennis, it wasn’t
women’s tennis. It was closer to a whole
different sport.
Spoke to my captain after the match. Yeah, he told me, it took a few seasons for
me to get used to it myself. Huh? A few
seasons? According to him, you have to
be able to change your shot selection, your position on the court, and several
hundred other things when you’re playing with a 3.5 woman instead of a 4.5
man. I suppose the same could be said
for 7.0 mixed when it’s a 4.0 man and a 3.5 woman. So the short term advice I got was that I needed
to play about 75% of the court and be ready to cover everything.
After a couple of wins I thought I had figured something
out. The next match my partner thought
she should be covering 75% of the court as well. You could say we had great court coverage
with both of us trying to play most of the court, but it didn’t really work out
that well. After nearly running into
each other for a mid-court ball I suggested that it might be best for me to hit
that ball next time. She suggested that
it was her forehand and (barely) was on her side of the court – and that she
had come out to play just like I had. Supposed
I can’t fault her for that.
I don’t know what the answer is and, luckily, at this point I
don’t care. I STILL HATE MIXED.
No one beat Kelly and Mary!!! PERIOD.....
ReplyDeleteAguilar and DaCosta would destroy them!
DeleteHe meant at 8.0 not 7.0.
DeleteKelly and anyone wins, but not Mary and anyone....see the pattern?
ReplyDeleteThanks Murray. You have just confirmed what Alan and Springpark and Kelley have done over the years is a lot more difficult than they make it look. And those guys are no spring chickens, at least Kelley, he is halfway to 100.
ReplyDeleteYou people make this sound like brain surgery for Pete's sake. I, like Murray, hate mixed and it should not be considered a sport. My take from this as follow: VERY SIMPLY PUT: DO NOT HIT BALL TO KELLEY. PERIOD. These bloggers act as if he plays singles. That is impossible. Make him vulnerable and move him around then whack it at the woman. GEEZ, amazing how clueless his opponents are!!!!
ReplyDeleteSo play him and lets us know how its turns out...
DeleteTo 11:21 Don't need to. Waste of time. Let's play some singles and see instead of sissie mixed.
DeleteTime, Date and Where?
DeleteQuestion. Is Kelley putting a gun to Murray's head forcing him to blog about mixed TWO weeks in a row???? If not, as much as I hate to admit, kelley has a lot more to do with what goes on in mixed than what I thought. When this takes precedence over two 5.5's playing as 3.5's this city is in a world of hurt. Kinda confirms Kelley owns the keys to the Dallas tennis city. Unbelievable.
ReplyDeleteWhat happened to Tony's player of the day expose?
ReplyDeleteI wonder if mixed wouldn't be better if it was a 3.5, 4.0 and 4.5 league instead of 7.0,8.0 and 9.0. The strong man, weaker woman really distorts play. This is a national USTA lissue with no local flexibility.
ReplyDeleteNext alphabetically is Shawn Arcaria -
ReplyDeleteafter going to 2013 nationals in 40+ and sectionals in 18+ and getting bumped up, he didn't tank well enough in the Fall and was still 4.0 for Spring 2014, he then tanked every match in Spring and Fall to get back down to 4.0 for Spring 2015. Very solid player especially when paired with a ringer.
Comments?
Didn't go win any Open tournaments while he was getting down? That's smart.
DeleteThis is stupid. Shawn isn't out of level. Tiny has players way out of level. He isn't one.
Deleteagree. Playing(and winning) with Glasgow got Shawn bumped up. He's a solid 4.0. Nothing more.
DeleteWith 2 mixed post in a row, Murray has finally revealed his identity. He's Mike Kelly. Who else would post mixed twice in a row.
ReplyDeleteI see one got bump up on Le team...
ReplyDeleteI don't see it.
Delete9:31-----Go back to sleep.
ReplyDeleteMiranda got bump up from 3.5 to 4.0 and they counted last match a lost..
DeleteOn Le 7.0 cheating team..
We are really discussing chick DQs?
DeleteWhen they are chicks that can beat you, then yes, we are discussing them.
DeleteI agree Arcarryme is a good 4.0 and a doubles specialist, would be a 3.5 in singles. When he plays with guys that carry him in doubles he is above average 4.0, and you will never see him play with lesser players. Who is next?
ReplyDeleteSkipping Bennett, not out of level
ReplyDeletenext is Ryan DelaPaz
won all 2011 4.0 spring matches until he played Houston, won three major zones
started tanking in 2014, bumped down to 4.0
undefeated at 4.0 in 40+ and 18+
How does Houston get these guys through good enough to beat Ryan? There is something wrong with that.
DeleteMaybe you hadn't noticed, they have players that generally beat all our guys.
DeleteLet's play Dallas 4.0 fantasy! Take all the 3.5 and/or 4.0 on all the other teams (not on Le's), and put together the top 10 or 12 guys. If you take that team to sectional, how would the fantasy team fair?
ReplyDeleteThe second place Dallas team traditionally does not make it out of its flight at sectionals. The last one I can think of was when Somabut and Sisk both made sectionals sunday and were both beaten by Houston. And it wasn't even Freeman. They wouldn't beat Tony's team and they wouldn't beat Freeman's team so what does it matter. It's not that hard to just get to sectionals, it's hard to win it.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93cST8DgJ2I
ReplyDeleteBif
Classic
ReplyDelete